Pirilin Solutions
  • Welcome
  • Who we are
    • Experience
    • Publications
  • Blog
  • Contact us
  • Mobilising your organisation

The challenge of value selling

12/6/2017

1 Comment

 
Picture
When an organisation faces difficult times, many wish to see sales pick up as a way to buy the organisation time to address its other problems.  While it cannot be done in isolation, an attempt to profitably lift sales figures is hard to sustain, as it means selling more and, more importantly, selling better.
 
Many businesses find themselves trapped in the delivery of long-term contracts with thinner and thinner margins as successive contract revisions have dented the profitability of the original agreement.  It can be partly explained by the change of actors around the table, with sales people being swapped for operational delivery managers on one hand, and the supplier relationship remaining with purchasing staff on the customer side.  As a consequence, there is no match of commercial capabilities between the two parties, and it becomes very easy to pick on itemised topics, restricting the discussion to unit cost and volumes.  A way to slow the margin erosion over the lifespan of a contract is to start from a higher point than what would be attained with a cost-plus model.  The trouble of value pricing is that it takes much more effort to sell, and it brings the fear of being outbid on price. 
 
Selling for value rests on a deep understanding of how your products are generating value for your potential customer.  The challenge is to identify the pain points of your potential customers and to quantify them.  Everyone will have a different narrative, and figuring it out has become easier with the wide range of data publicly available.  Beyond fact finding, a granular quantification of what is at stake requires a strong business acumen and an understanding of what the currency is for a specific client.
If you client has a high churn rate of its customers, and needs a strong marketing presence to even maintain market share, the value you can offer will be in your speed of service rather than in its real cost.  You will help your client to be more responsive to its customer base, which can become a competitive advantage and relax the need to spend as much in marketing.  If your client does not understand well enough your product and rely heavily on it to create its customer experience, you can offer services to bridge that capability gap. 
 
Aware of these pain points, the art of selling for value is to craft a solution together with the customer.   It takes the ability to drive the conversation in order to mutually agree what the real problem is, how this could be addressed, and why a commonly defined solution would fit with your delivery capabilities.  At some point during the conversation, the framing of the solution and its matching with your delivery capabilities will be owned by your customer, and then – but only then – time is on your side.  Strengthened by the belief that its specific issue can be addressed, the customer will be ready to buy from you a solution that is uniquely crafted and therefore cannot be replicated.
 
So, when you begin to moan the low profitability your current sales practices are generating, it might be worth asking yourself the following questions:
  1. Do sales mostly happen through tenders or are there instances when you do not face competition?
  2. What depth of understanding have your sales reps of the business challenges faced by their prospects?  How is it documented?
  3. How commercially minded are your sales reps when framing the discussion about your offering?
1 Comment

Sales and its bear traps

27/11/2016

4 Comments

 
Picture
For businesses selling their products or services to other businesses, a lot of discipline is required to keep sales sustainably profitable.  These efforts are more difficult to gauge than those required from a production line to avoid waste and gain flexibility.  They are nonetheless key to maintain focus, as sales can easily be blinded by the perceived upside of new deals.

There are four temptations to be aware of.  The first one is to drift from what can consistently be delivered for the sake of striking a deal.  Such instances are often observed when new customers are courted, to be gained whatever it takes.  The delivery organisation can then find itself in the impossibility to profitably honour the contract, be it for high cost to serve, low quality issues, or challenging contractual arrangements. 

The second temptation is to go for bigger and bigger bets when the sales forecast becomes difficult to achieve.  With size come unfactored challenges.  Negotiations can become complex and distract the sales and bidding team for elusive results.  Execution on large programs is riskier and it requires managerial attention and high resource allocation.  Finally, a greater exposure to fewer customers reduces the diversification of the customer portfolio.

The third trap is to believe that gaining new customers is an easy way to improve sales results.  Too many sales organisations are attempting to “grow” their market share by cold-calling prospective customers with very little hope of dislodging the incumbent partner they have.  Such practice has little odd of being successful without any reason to change arrangements in place.  At best, it will serve as a benchmarking exercise for the potential customer.

The last temptation is to think that offering new features will attract and/ or retain customers better.  Sure, the argument goes, there must be a killer product or service that would make offers stick, whose absence justifies the lack of success in selling the current value proposition.  Whereas technologies evolve and products can become obsolete, poor sales results are more likely to have an internal cause, like the sequencing and timing of business development discussions.

These behaviours are hard to spot, as they tend to incrementally settle in.  Yet, they can be avoided if the sales and delivery organisations work well together.  Indeed, most of the trouble in which sales can put the whole organisation can be avoided through proper communication.  This would highlight the dangers of excessively loading the production or service delivery schedule, flag the gaps between what is pitched for and where the delivery capabilities of the organisation are, or honestly assess whether someone in the customer organisation is ready to act as a sponsor for a particular proposal.  Opportunities need to be given for these conversations to take place throughout the sales and delivery journey.  Their presence can be shaped by the management team, and a little bit of formalism never hurts to make sure the fundamentals are well and truly covered.

So, when you start observing a fault line between your sales activities and your operation, ask yourself the following questions to check how urgent it is for you to refocus your business development:
  1. Are our sales efforts leading to unprofitable commitments further down the line?
  2. How big are our top five customers, and how captive are we with them?
  3. Is there a good balance in the sales pipeline between attracting new customers and harvesting existing ones?
  4. Are post-mortem analyses of failed proposals pointing more at product enhancements as remedial actions?
4 Comments

    Archives

    July 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016

    Categories

    All
    Communication
    Decision Making
    Sales
    Transformation Skills

    RSS Feed

Xavier Delhaise
+44 7545 865 802
xavier_delhaise@pirilin.com